Jim Ulvog

Big bank penalties in last five years offset industry profits for first decade of this century

That’s the conclusion from Keefe, Bruyette & Woods in a report they just released, which I can’t find online.

The analysts there calculated that the big bank and brokerage firms made $152B in profits from 2001 through 2010 (please no comments on the century and decade actually starting in 2000).

Fine and civil settlements paid by 43 banks …

Big bank penalties in last five years offset industry profits for first decade of this century Read More »

A few updates on the Forex settlement

Just a few more tidbits from the forex settlements announced yesterday.

Some more ideas from the WSJ coverage in their article, Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Take Brunt of Currencies Settlement.

Three agencies are still investigating: The Federal Reserve, Department of Justice, and NY Department of Financial Services. DoJ and DFS will probably have the big fines and sanctions.

A few updates on the Forex settlement Read More »

Settlements for Forex manipulation announced. We will need to wait for all settlements to learn if this is only a cost of doing business

Three major regulators announced settlements with six banks for their now admitted manipulation of foreign exchange rates. At least two regulators (Department of Justice and NY Department of Financial Services) still have investigations open. One bank, Barclays, withdrew from the settlement.

The scheme ran for six years, starting after the fall 2007 meltdown and running until a year after the Libor settlements were underway.

Here is my recap of the fines by bank with calculation of the annualized cost, all amounts in U.S. dollars: …

Settlements for Forex manipulation announced. We will need to wait for all settlements to learn if this is only a cost of doing business Read More »

Insider trading case – now we can watch the release dates

May not be many people interested at the moment in knowing release dates for Scott London and Bryan Shaw as they continue to serve their time in federal pen. My blog continues to get a small stream of referrals from search results, so there is some teeny tiny bit of interest.

That prompted me to check the status of the two golf buddies who are serving time for insider trading.

Where are they now?

Insider trading case – now we can watch the release dates Read More »

Why separate blogs for nonprofits, accounting, and coping with change? Why so much discussion on banking and energy?

  • Why do I have so many blogs?
  • Why are there separate blogs appealing to the nonprofit world and CPAs?
  • Why do so many posts talk about banking?
  • Why so much discussion of energy production?

Might be time to mention again how my writing is organized.

The basic idea is that blogs need to have a narrow focus in terms of topics or issues. Then the blog will gather an audience of people with that interest. Cover too many topics and everyone will lose interest.

That means I have split up the core of my writing into three blogs, each designed to appeal to a different audience. People interested in one of those areas may not be interested in the other topics, so I assign my posts to the blog that will have readers who will be more interested in that discussion. The main blogs are:

Why separate blogs for nonprofits, accounting, and coping with change? Why so much discussion on banking and energy? Read More »

So you think tons of bankers should be in jail? Getting a jury to agree seems to be a problem.

Looks like it is really hard to prove individual culpability for conspiracy when a banker’s employer was aiding tax evasion. (I don’t use the word alleged in a sentence saying a bank committed a crime because UBS has already ‘fessed up and paid a $780,000,000 fine.)

11/4 – Wall Street journal – Acquittal in UBS Case Sets Back Tax Probe – A senior executive of UBS was on trial for allegedly helping Americans evade income taxes. The feds alleged that the banker ran a conspiracy to launder money and evade taxes, with said conspiracy involving cloak and dagger techniques to hide from authorities that the bank was knowingly and intentionally laundering money for its clients.

Didn’t turn out well for those who want to see a new federal penitentiary built to hold all the bankers who belong in jail.

So you think tons of bankers should be in jail? Getting a jury to agree seems to be a problem. Read More »

Looks like settlements in forex manipulation fiasco might be an order of magnitude higher – hard to keep track of the estimates

Anyone else having trouble keeping track of the rumors on the forex settlement talks?

Previously discussed that a few too-big-to-fail/jail/manage banks might have fines in the range of $0.5 to $1.0 billion apiece. Looks like the rumors of settlement amounts were off a lot.

A few articles that leave me scratching my head: …

Looks like settlements in forex manipulation fiasco might be an order of magnitude higher – hard to keep track of the estimates Read More »

What’s the better description – “Audit” or Limited Review of Financial Statements

A few weeks ago I had the opportunity to interview Sam Antar, previously CFO of crazy Eddie and currently convicted felon. There are several other posts from our discussion.

During our conversation he pointed out that audits are limited in terms of time and are limited in scope. An audit is not a forensic analysis.

He described our current methodology as designed to detect material unintentional errors.

(I would add to that something about looking for material intentional errors that are non collusive or are in the obvious places. Add your own paraphrase of our responsibilities to look for fraud.)

Those limits suggest to him that a better describe of what we do would be: …

What’s the better description – “Audit” or Limited Review of Financial Statements Read More »

Update on Forex manipulation. Also, another thought why the banking fiascos won’t be ending anytime soon

Previously mentioned the big banks are under investigation for allegedly manipulating forex: Next banking fiasco? Manipulating foreign exchange rates? Those are the rates used to trade currencies. In addition to admitting manipulation of Libor, many banks now stand accused of manipulating forex.

Just two updates..

10/30 – Wall Street Journal – Big Banks Brace for Penalties in Probes – Tons of leaks feed the story of the typical cast of big banks being in negotiations to settle allegations of their manipulating foreign exchange rates, or forex. Big news to me is the banks are all trying to settle at the same time with all of the regulators.

(If one company reaching a simultaneous agreement with every regulator is called a global settlement, then if every company in the industry reaches an agreement with all regulators on the same day, would that be called a global global settlement? Universal global settlement?)

Update on Forex manipulation. Also, another thought why the banking fiascos won’t be ending anytime soon Read More »