Attestation Update – A&A for CPAs

Technical stuff for CPAs providing attestation services

First sentencing for leak of PCAOB inspection list to KPMG

leave a comment »

Image courtesy of Adobe Stock.

A former Inspections Leader at PCAOB who went to work for KPMG as an Executive Director and was involved in leaking lists of audits scheduled for inspection was sentenced today.

Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Jim Ulvog

August 9, 2019, 17:35 pm at 5:35 pm

Posted in Audits

Tagged with , ,

Peer review tips – tidbits from the 2019 Peer Review Conference

leave a comment »

Image courtesy of Adobe Stock.

If you get a peer review of your attestation practice, I heard a few ideas in the AICPA’s Peer Review Conference you might want to know about.  I attended this year’s conference via webcast. First time I’ve gone through a 16 hour class online. The technology worked acceptably well. Saving the travel time was wonderful.

Annual update to Peer Review Information form

Starting next year, May 2020 specifically, every firm enrolled in the peer review program will need to update the Peer Review Information (PRI) form annually. Each firm will have to log into PRIMA and update the list of the type of engagements performed.

Not sure the reasons this change is going into effect. One component is so AICPA can monitor for changes the nature of a firm’s client base to see if a higher level of service is needed.

Focus areas in system reviews

The AICPA surveyed CPAs who provide a large number of reviews asking them what portion of their peer review clients had significant struggles with complying with the risk assessment standards. Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Jim Ulvog

August 8, 2019, 7:00 am at 7:00 am

FASB plans to postpone changes in lease and credit loss standards for non-public companies.

leave a comment »

Image courtesy of Adobe Stock.

FASB decided on 7/17/19 to postpone four major accounting rule changes for non-public companies. Journal of Accountancy reported the news on 7/17/19:  FASB to propose delaying effective dates for 4 major standards.

(Cross-posted from my other blog, Nonprofit Update.)

Two of the rules are particularly significant to the non-profit community while two will affect few charities.

The article uses a new method of identifying effective dates. It mentions January 1 of the year the standard will first be effective instead of the ol’ “fiscal years beginning after December 15” phrasing usually used..

Changes include:

Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Jim Ulvog

July 19, 2019, 7:05 am at 7:05 am

Posted in Accounting

New audit standards for ERISA audits and other information in annual reports (SAS 136, 137)

leave a comment »

Image courtesy of Adobe Stock.

Two more audit standards have been issued by the Auditing Standards Board addressing ERISA audits and other information in an annual report:

  • SAS 136Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements of Employee Benefit Plans Subject to ERISA
  • SAS 137The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Other Information Included in Annual Reports.

Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Jim Ulvog

July 17, 2019, 8:34 am at 8:34 am

Posted in Audits

Tagged with ,

Comments from recent continuing education classes worth repeating: not-for-profit entities.

leave a comment »

Image courtesy of Adobe Stock.

Here are some fun or interesting or useful tidbits from the October 2018 A&A and the June 2019 Not-for-profit conferences presented by California Society of CPAs that apply to not-for-profit organizations.

Previous posts had comments on

Non-attest services and Yellow Book independence. Everyone probably knows that charities with more than $2 million of revenue who are registered with the California Attorney General must have an audit. Excluded from the requirement would be religious organizations, who are exempt from registering with the AG.

That requirement was created by the Nonprofit Integrity Act of 2004, so it’s old news.

The best payoff from attending CPE conferences is to compare every piece of information you hear to what you think you know. So, here is one of the big rewards for me attending this class…

Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Jim Ulvog

July 5, 2019, 8:36 am at 8:36 am

Posted in Accounting, Audits

Tagged with ,

Comments from recent continuing education classes worth repeating: “get in or get out”

with 2 comments

If you are an auditor and that is a diagram of new audit rules, then you need to completely understand the graph. Image courtesy of Adobe Stock.

Here are some fun or interesting or useful tidbits from the October 2018 A&A and the June 2019 Not-for-profit conferences presented by California Society of CPAs.

Previous posts had comments on accounting and auditing as well as peer review.

“Get in or get out”

The second speaker who discussed peer review in previous post also said that if you are doing A&A work you need to “get in or get out.”

Let me translate that…

Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Jim Ulvog

July 1, 2019, 6:31 am at 6:31 am

Comments from recent continuing education classes worth repeating: peer review

with 4 comments

Image courtesy of Adobe Stock.

Here are some fun or interesting or useful tidbits from the October 2018 A&A and the June 2019 Not-for-profit conferences presented by California Society of CPAs.

Previous post had comments on accounting and auditing.

Peer review

One speaker said there are several common issues for weaknesses in risk assessment:

  • Limited assessment
  • No linkage (relating the assessment of risks to further audit procedures)
  • Poor use of third-party practice tools
  • No assessment of IT risks

Not doing any risk assessment is now a major problem for you in a peer review if you missed the boat on the risk suite of standards.

For Yellow Book audit, the workpapers must document SKE (skills, knowledge, experience) of staff overseeing non-attest services.  Although the professional standards do not exactly require documentation of SKE for non-attest service on a non-yellow book audit, the speaker said (if I heard correctly) that the California Peer Review Committee has a considered opinion that such documentation is required.

So, if you have non-attest services on a non-yellow book audit, Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Jim Ulvog

June 28, 2019, 7:54 am at 7:54 am