August 2011

Happy birthday to Nonprofit Update

(cross-post from my other blog, Nonprofit Update.)

It has been one year since I launched Nonprofit Update. On August 29, 2010 I started this blog to talk about issues affecting the nonprofit community. On October 14, 2010 I started moving topics of more interest to CPAs to a new blog, Attestation Update.

Many thanks to all who have stopped by to read!  This has been fun and I look forward to many more years of blogging.

Here are some stats from the first year for those who are interested in such things.

Number of posts:

Two more CPE classes on SSARS are available

(cross-post from my other blog, Nonprofit Update)

Earlier this year I wrote a CPE course on SSARS requirements for CCH . Back in April I mentioned Compilation and Review: Practice Issues (Third Edition) was available. Discussed that course here.  Two more SSARS classes I wrote are now online.  Another will be available soon.  Each of the following classes are two CPE hours.

Compilation and Review: IntroductionCourse description from CCH:

Technology bringing fee reductions to legal work

Technology is starting to produce new business models for providing legal services, especially for big projects.

Why discuss this in an accounting blog? We CPAs need to be attentive to what is happening around us. We need to be armchair futurists, as I’ve discussed on my other blog.

The Economist has a great article, Alternative Law Firms – Bargain Briefs, describing some new models.

Other than being almost impossible to implement, audit firm rotation is a great idea

Jim Peterson points out several rather severe problems with mandatory firm rotation.

Mandatory Auditor Rotation – The PCAOB Sails Off the Charts into the waters where

the legend written on the old flat-earth maps – that beyond the horizons of ignorance, (says) “there be dragons.”

You probably should check your LinkedIn privacy settings

Looked at my settings. Much to my surprise, I found out I had opted-in to have my name and photo included in ads for products. Might be worth checking your settings.

First tidbit – social ads. Technique of using your photo and name on ads shown to people in your network for items that you have recommended or followed.

Second tidbit – you have to opt-out of social ads at LinkedIn.

How?

PCAOB will meet to discuss a concept statement about asking for comments on maybe requiring mandatory firm rotation.

Still quite iffy. PCAOB is thinking about maybe asking for reaction to the idea.  A long way from implementation, but it is the next step on that path.

John Hufnagle has a few more words on the topic at Audit Firm Rotation – The Train Is Starting Its Engine. Gotta’ love the title of his post!

I think it is a bad idea. …

Post-implementation issues from SSARS 19 – some good reminders – 2

Highlights of some implementation issues of SSARS 19 discussed by Michael Glynn, CPA, in the August 2011 issue of California CPA magazine. Article is called Life After SSARS No. 19.

 Previous post discussed the need to remember the transition date and that new work performed on years ending prior to 12-15-10 needs to be performed and reported under the pre-SSARS 19 rules.  Also a reminder about the option to disclose reasons for lack of independence.

Final idea from Mr. Glynn that I wanted to mention:

Focus on goal of a review and the level of work needed

Post-implementation issues from SSARS 19 – some good reminders – 1

Highlights of some implementation issues of SSARS 19 discussed by Michael Glynn, CPA, in the August 2011 issue of California CPA magazine. Article is called Life After SSARS No. 19.

A few ideas Mr. Glynn mentions:

Transition date

If you are doing a review or comp on financial statements for periods before 12-15-10, you need to use the pre-SSARS 19 rules. Mr. Glynn says:

Some CPAs have mistakenly concluded that after Dec. 15, 2010, SSARS No. 19 was the rule of the land, and that they could disregard the pre-SSARS No. 19 literature. Not so fast. …

Thinking of doing a little “file cleanup” before an inspection? Think about the consequences too.

Maybe not such a great idea after all.

An E&Y partner, senior manager, and manager were sanctioned by the PCAOB for some file clean up in advance of an inspection. They backdated four difference pieces of new documentation. They did not identify the documents were added after the documentation completion date.  All three are prohibited for several years from working for a firm registered with PCAOB.  The partner was fined $50,000.

What time frame is used for engagements in a peer review? Getting started on a peer review, part 5

You will have a particular date as the cut off for your peer review. This determines what is included in the population for selecting engagements to review.

A common misunderstanding is to think that the population for selection is those engagements issued during the peer review year.