Audits

Why does PCAOB definition of ‘audit failure’ overstate audit failures? Perhaps because saying ‘audits that should have done better which we found after intentionally looking for audits that might have deficiencies’ doesn’t sound as severe.

The PCAOB’s self-created definition of audit failures overstates the severity of issues found during inspection, according to a board member of the PCAOB.

Journal of Accountancy reports on 3/21 a PCAOB member suggesting Stop using “audit failure” term in PCAOB reports, Hanson says.

Mr. Jay Hanson says the definition used by the PCAOB is causing confusion about the severity of issues identified during inspections. Here’s the range of definitions of that phrase:

Casual description of PCAOB usage, according to the article:

Why does PCAOB definition of ‘audit failure’ overstate audit failures? Perhaps because saying ‘audits that should have done better which we found after intentionally looking for audits that might have deficiencies’ doesn’t sound as severe. Read More »

More good stuff for auditors – 3-12-14

A few links and comments of interest to auditors. Big firms book increasing amount of consulting work and whether the PCAOB’s definition of audit failure a bit too broad.

3/3 – Accounting Onion – Accounting Complexity: What if “Truth in Labeling” were and Accounting Principle? – If we applied ‘truth in labeling’ to property, plant, and equipment, we’d have to call it something like

undepreciated cost stated in ancient units of purchasing power.

If we did that, what in the world would be a truthful label for right of use asset under the proposed lease rules?

More good stuff for auditors – 3-12-14 Read More »

KPMG global chairman speaks about insider trading fiasco

John Veihmeyer, U.S. and global chairman of KPMG, addressed the Scott London insider trading mess during a speaking event with the University of Richmond’s Robins School of Business on Tuesday evening, March 4.

I found coverage of his discussion in two media outlets:

The Times-Dispatch article has the following comments:

Veihmeyer said he made the decision to fire London on the day — a Friday afternoon — he learned the partner was under federal investigation.

The following Monday, Veihmeyer told the firm’s leadership team not to circle the wagons, but to put out a public announcement about the investigation. KPMG also withdrew as the accounting firm for the two companies that had been compromised.

KPMG global chairman speaks about insider trading fiasco Read More »

More good stuff for auditors – 3-3-14

A few links and comments of interest to auditors –

2-1 – CPA-Scribo – Code of Ethics Codification Approved by AICPA – Charles Hall has the news flash that the codified rewrite of the ethics rules has been approved. Will be effective 12/15/14. See his post for a summary and link to the current version, which is subject to editing.

2-3 – Thriveal – Accounting for what? – Here’s a great thought question. …

More good stuff for auditors – 3-3-14 Read More »

More consequences of insider trading – #11

Previous post explained Mr. Scott London surrendered his CPA license as a consequence of his guilty plea to insider trading. This discussion will go through the timing of the disciplinary process and outline a few more well-deserved consequences Mr. London has earned.

Update #74, which contains a summary of the action can be found here. The formal disciplinary action can be found here.

Timing

More consequences of insider trading – #11 Read More »

Scott London surrendered his CPA license in December 2013

California Board of Accountancy’s Update #74, sent by email this morning, had the following news:

LONDON, SCOTT IAN

Agoura Hills, CA (CPA 46174)

CBA ACTIONS

Surrender of CPA license, via stipulated settlement.

Mr. London shall pay the CBA its costs of investigation and prosecution in the amount of $1,637.50 prior to issuance of a new or reinstated license.

Effective December 27, 2013

CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE

Scott London surrendered his CPA license in December 2013 Read More »

The suspense and wait continues – Scott London sentencing for insider trading rescheduled from February 27 to April 21

Since there has been so much traffic today checking out posts about the scheduled date for Scott London’s sentencing for his admitted insider trading (thank you for the mention, Going Concern!), I thought to check the federal document system before turning in for the night.

Guess what I found?

The sentencing has been continued from February 27 to April 21.

Previously mentioned there were four documents filed under seal.

As of yesterday morning, all four entries had a date of 2/18/2014 and said:

SEALED DOCUMENT- Under Seal Document (mat) (Entered: 02/19/2014)

When I looked a few minutes ago, item #45 still had a date of 2/18/2014 but the comment has been changed.  It now reads:

SEALED DOCUMENT- Under Seal Document – Sentencing hearing set for 02/27/14, continued to 04/21/14 at 8:00 a.m. (mat) Modified on 2/24/2014 (jag). (Entered: 02/19/2014)

That means the sentencing which had previously been scheduled for February 27 has now been moved to April 21, 2014.

Everyone who had been looking forward to a generous serving of popcorn and schadenfreude on Thursday will have to wait another 2 months. 

Update:  According to the comments on the docket, sentencing has been continued to the following dates: 10/21/13, 12/9/13, 1/27/14, 2/6/14, 2/27/14, 4/21/14.

Other tidbits: Passport was surrendered on 4/17/13. Turned in $50K on 4/19/13, which is presumably the estimated proceeds of the then-alleged insider trading.

The suspense and wait continues – Scott London sentencing for insider trading rescheduled from February 27 to April 21 Read More »

Minor updates on insider trading fiasco at KPMG including more consequences

Since we are all anticipating the expected sentencing on Thursday for Mr. Scott London, regional audit PIC, lately of KPMG, here’s two tidbits I’ve noticed over the last few months but haven’t mentioned previously. Cost of re-auditing Herbalife will drop into the category of earned consequences when KPMG gets around to suing Mr. London. In older news, Mr. London updated his LinkedIn profile.

Minor updates on insider trading fiasco at KPMG including more consequences Read More »

Sentencing watch for insider trading case

Sentencing is scheduled for former KPMG regional audit PIC Scott London on February 27, 2014 regarding his plea agreement admitting insider trading. That’s the latest visible information in the federal system that shows filings.

Previous post mentioned on 2/13 that Something in London case about to go under seal.

On 2/18 there were four documents filed under seal. Obviously the contents of those filings aren’t visible on the PACER system. My completely wild, uneducated guess would be those are arguments from the defense and prosecution about sentencing. Could also be recommendations from the federal group that provides sentencing guidance to judges.

If you are really interested, keep your eyes open on Thursday. If you are only slightly interested, check back here. I’ll keep you updated.

Update: Next post – minor updates, including LinkedIn profile and cost of reauditing Herbalife

UPDATE on sentencing date here.

Sentencing watch for insider trading case Read More »

Something in London case about to go under seal

Just checking to see if anything new is showing up on a couple of cases I’m following in the federal PACER system.

Sentencing arguments were due to the court on 2/13/14 in the case of Scott London, lately a senior partner at KPMG. He was the regional audit PIC prior to getting his picture on the front page of the Wall Street Journal during an FBI recorded cash-for-inside-information payment.

On 2/13/14, the Assistant US Attorney filed an ex parte motion to place something under seal. The document description is “other” and the reason is “under seal.”  Setting aside my severely limited knowledge of law and using my businessman’s understanding instead, I think that means the documents will be under seal and the reason it will be nonpublic is under seal.

My very wild guess on the contents is based on the filing taking place on the day the sentencing positions were due. My guess? The sealed document is the sentencing argument from the feds.

Your guess?

Updates:

UPDATE on sentencing date here.

Something in London case about to go under seal Read More »

Newest book on differences between audits, reviews, and compilations now available in print and for Nook

Print copy and Nook e-book are in addition to availability for the Kindle and another half-dozen formats.

audit review compilation cover for wordpress croped

The book is an intentionally short read at about 30 pages. The print copy has 20 pages of text.  Focus is to quickly describe the differences between those levels of services using three illustrations:

  • A football game – How does advancing to the 10-yard line compare to an audit?
  • What would a review look like in a football game?
  • Buying a used car – How does taking the car for a test drive compare to a review?
  • Filling a bucket – How filling it up with water to different levels illustrates the differences between the levels of service.

It also explains the differences in plain language. Well, at least using less accountantese than you would usually get from an accountant.

This is a compilation of posts previously appearing on my blogs, with slight editing.

Where can you find the book?

Print book at Amazon here.

Nook e-book at Barnes and Noble here.

Kindle e-book at Amazon here.

Also available here in other formats:

  • ePub format for your iDevices
  • PDF
  • text
  • Mobi for your Kindle device

Newest book on differences between audits, reviews, and compilations now available in print and for Nook Read More »

Growing complexity will increase. That will make auditing even more challenging.

The overall rate of change today is increasing. This carries over to the business world. Commerce is getting more complex with every quarter that passes.

That will carry over to us as practitioners.

That’s the comment from a speaker at a recent conference.

Growing complexity will increase. That will make auditing even more challenging. Read More »

Today’s entry in the dumbest CPA competition: shorting employer’s stock, in advance of bad news, in wife’s account

Good grief. A CPA should know better. Someone who worked in public accounting really, really ought to know better. Someone sent an email telling them not to trade company stock within a specific timeframe really, really, really ought to know better.

The complaint against the accountant who didn’t know better and his unwilling wife as filed by the SEC on 1-28-14 is here. Separately, the US AG filed criminal charges, according to another article: CPA Charged with Insider Trading via His Wife’s Account.

A few highlights of the civil complaint:

Today’s entry in the dumbest CPA competition: shorting employer’s stock, in advance of bad news, in wife’s account Read More »