Audits

Article in the Wall Street Journal on 12-7-11 gives more background on the methodology of the Olympus fraud:  Panel Calls Olympus ‘Rotten’ at Core. (article behind paywall)

I made a few updates on my part 2 post. Have a few more comments in this post – things that are interesting to me.

Hiding losses was legal and normal

Apparently, moving underwater investments off the books was so common in Japan that it had a nickname, tobashi.  …

Summary of Olympus financial fraud – part 2aRead More »

Previous post described the investigative report of the Olympus financial fraud.

Now a discussion of the debits and credits. Final post will discuss the underlying causes identify by the investigative committee and some of their recommendations.

Update 2 – When accounting rules changed in 2000, the report says Olympus management decided to move the investments off the books instead of taking the write down. Thus phase 1 was launched.

How do you hide a $1.7B loss?

This is what I was most curious about and what prompted me to read the report.

Here is a one paragraph summary from the report: …

Summary of Olympus financial fraud – part 2Read More »

The investigative report on the Olympus fraud has been released. The fact pattern, causes, and recommendations are scathing.

This and my followup post are a thumbnail description.  These are the result of just an hour or two of research.  If you wish to expand the summary, point out errors, or clarify, feel free to do so.  My guess is that readers of this blog won’t want as many details as I am providing, but do want to know more than just what shows up in the general news reports.

You can see one news article here: Olympus faces Tokyo delisting after management hid $1.7 billion of losses.

The Wall Street Journal has a good report, but it is behind a pay wall. WSJ also has a copy of the report, but I caution you on getting their copy.  I was able to access the report once, but when I went back to it, accessing the report crashed my computer. Twice.

Update: Olympus has made the report available here.

The report’s conclusion compares management to a cancer:

Olympus had originally been a sound company, with diligent employees and high technical strength. Not all part (sic) of the company was involved in this misconduct. Olympus should remove its malignant tumor and literally renew itself. (Page 30)

What is the amount of the fraud and time frame?

…

Summary of Olympus financial fraud – based on independent report – part 1Read More »

Yeah, Olympus.  The people who made that cool camera you’ve been using.

Here’s the story in one sentence: It looks like Olympus has been materially cooking the books since the late 1990s.

In one paragraph:

The maker of cameras and medical-imaging equipment said Tuesday that it used four acquisitions in 2008 to “clear up” paper losses on investments dating to the 1990s. Asahi and KPMG AZSA signed off on Olympus’s statements for those years. There’s no indication that the accounting firm signed statements that it knew were misleading or incorrect.

…

Time to start paying attention to the Olympus accounting fiascoRead More »