Attestation Update – A&A for CPAs

Technical stuff for CPAs providing attestation services

Archive for the ‘Compilations & reviews’ Category

2017 Risk Alerts available

leave a comment »

Image is from AICPA. Used under Fair Use since, after all, I am promoting three of their products.

Image of Audit Risk Alert is from AICPA. Used under Fair Use since, after all, I am promoting three of their products.

The 2017 audit season is about to begin. Planning is well underway for all those 12/31 clients.

To help you get ready, the annual updates to AICPA risk alerts are available. Consider:

I read the risk alerts every year. They are great for reminding me of what I already knew and even better for pointing out what tidbits I had missed.

You might want to check them out in the lull before the rush of field work hits.

Written by Jim Ulvog

December 19, 2016, 7:18 am at 7:18 am

Two new SSARS documents, #22 and #23

leave a comment »

Image courtesy of Adobe Stock.

Image courtesy of Adobe Stock.

There are two new SSARS pronouncements. Most likely they will not be a big deal for most accountants, but if you work in the comp or review arena, you need to know they exist and you really ought to have a vague idea what is in them.

First, a tip on staying out of trouble on nonattest services…

11/1 – Journal of Accountancy – Nonattest services quiz – A great six question quiz on nonatttest services. Take the quiz to find out how well you are doing on independence and documentation requirements. By the way, if you miss some questions you probably taking out some really serious risk in your audit practice that you didn’t even know about.

This is a great opportunity to find out what you don’t know, which can hurt you.

9/23 – Journal of Accountancy – ARSC complete clarity project with issuance of SSARS No. 22Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Jim Ulvog

November 18, 2016, 11:20 am at 11:20 am

Posted in Compilations & reviews

Tagged with ,

More disciplinary action from California Board of Accountancy over peer review messes.

with 2 comments

Image courtesy of Adobe Stock.

Image courtesy of Adobe Stock.

The Fall 2016 Update newsletter from the California Board of Accountancy shows CBA continues to be deadly serious about CPAs avoiding the peer review program.

I previously went into detail on disciplinary actions in one newsletter:  If you have been blowing off Peer Review, you really ought to get with the program. This time I will just give an overview.

Revocations of license

Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Jim Ulvog

November 11, 2016, 7:43 am at 7:43 am

Posted in Audits, Compilations & reviews

Tagged with

“Be Prepared – A Comprehensive Peer Review Update”

with one comment

Image courtesy of Adobe Stock.

Image courtesy of Adobe Stock.

The following article provides a superb update on recent developments in the peer review program. The article is graciously provided by the California Society of CPAs and the information described here applies in all jurisdictions across the U.S.

Because the entire article is quoted verbatim without any additional comments from me, none of the article will be placed in quotation marks.

Originally published by CalCPA (www.calcpa.org) in the October issue of California CPA magazine.

Used with written permission of the California Society of CPAs. 

 

Be Prepared – A Comprehensive Peer Review Update

By Linda McCrone

 

Peer review is a successful program that helps firms improve their quality control systems and elevate the quality of accounting and auditing engagements. The AICPA contributed the software program that tracks peer reviews and the staff that manages the program. AICPA member volunteers contribute their time to oversee the program, keep the peer review program forms current and make certain that the peer review standards remain relevant. But like any successful program, peer review must continue to evolve to keep up with events.

 

Background

Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Jim Ulvog

October 18, 2016, 8:54 am at 8:54 am

“Compilation of Pro Forma Financial Information”

leave a comment »

Image courtesy of Adobe Stock.

Image courtesy of Adobe Stock.

SSARS #22 addresses Compilation of Pro Forma Financial Information. This document rolls SSARS #14 into the clarified format. This is the last section of the old SSARS to be rewritten as a clarified document.

You can find the document here.

It will be effective for compilations of pro forma info dated on or after May 1, 2017.

Charles Hall has a superb recap of the document at his blog, CPA-Scribo:  Are You Up to Speed on the New Pro Forma Information Standards?  If you want to get up to speed really fast, check out his article.

Written by Jim Ulvog

October 17, 2016, 7:27 am at 7:27 am

Two deadlines to keep in mind if your peer review didn’t go well

leave a comment »

Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com

Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com

If your peer review resulted in anything other than a pass report there are a couple of deadlines you need to remember if you are in California.

Keep in mind you are responsible for your compliance with regulations. Here are a few tips to point you in the right direction. These comments discuss the regs in California. If you are in another state, you really ought to check out what your board of accountancy has to say. I’ll guess there is some comparable reporting requirement when a peer review does not turn out well.

Notification requirement for reports less than pass — 45 days

If you received either a pass with deficiency or a fail report, you need to be in touch with the California Board of Accountancy (CBA).

Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Jim Ulvog

July 20, 2016, 9:20 am at 9:20 am

One framework for the ideal CPA trade association – Implications for the proposed AICPA-CIMA merger

leave a comment »

 Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com

Image courtesy of DollarPhotoClub.com

Professors Paul Miller and Paul Bahnson writing at Accounting Today describe their ideal professional association – and why the AICPA doesn’t measure up.

Use their framework to assess the proposed merger of the AICPA and CIMA.

My previous comments on the merger:  On that merger of the AICPA and the CIMA resulting in a new AICPA.

The professors suggest the following premises for what a trade association would look like if the goal was to advance the profession and the interest of its members. I will quote their comments:

Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Jim Ulvog

May 9, 2016, 7:24 am at 7:24 am