UBS settles LIBOR manipulation claims for $1.5B and one guilty plea. Looks like some individual prosecutions may follow.

By agreeing to the settlement, UBS also acknowledges that several dozen traders, managers, and senior managers tried to manipulate multiple rates, including the Yen Libor, Euribor, and 4 currencies of the Libor index.  Their subsidiary in Japan will plead guilty to one felony charge in the U.S.

This from multiple media reports. See especially the Wall Street Journal article, UBS to Pay $1.5 Billion to Settle Libor Charges (behind paywall).

One obscure part of the story may turn out to be the biggest – there may be individual prosecutions in the near future

Update:  The U.S. Justice Department has unsealed formal charges against two former UBS employees.  You can read multiple news reports, but can start at the WSJ’s Two Former UBS Traders Charged in Libor Probe, which says:

The former traders, … , who lives in England, and …  a resident of Switzerland, were both charged with conspiracy, the Justice Department said. 

Mr. … was also charged with wire fraud and price fixing.

A quick summary from the WSJ:

As part of the deal, UBS acknowledged that dozens of its employees were involved in widespread efforts to manipulate the London interbank offered rate, or Libor, as well as other benchmark rates, which together serve as the basis for interest rates on hundreds of trillions of dollars of financial contracts around the world. UBS’s unit in Japan, where much of the attempted manipulation took place, pleaded guilty to one U.S. count of fraud

The British regulator, Financial Services Authority, was able to specifically identify over 2,000 attempts to manipulate the rate with knowledge and involvement of at least 45 traders and managers.

UBS settles LIBOR manipulation claims for $1.5B and one guilty plea. Looks like some individual prosecutions may follow. Read More »

Settlement of $1.5B possible for UBS over allegedly playing games with LIBOR. And maybe some individual criminal indictments.

The Wall Street Journal reports $1.5B is the expectation for a settlement next week.  See their article A Shadow Over Banks as UBS Nears Deal.

(Behind paywall, so either grab yesterday’s paper quick or get an online subscription. Or do both.)

Criminal charges?

Settlement of $1.5B possible for UBS over allegedly playing games with LIBOR. And maybe some individual criminal indictments. Read More »

Euribor, cousin of Libor, may have been cooked too

This was my depressing reading at lunchtime:  Banking Industry Squirms Over European Rate Probe, in today’s Wall Street Journal.  

Oh great.  Looks like Euribor has been gamed by the big banks (pronounced eur-EYE-bore according to WSJ).

The article reports:

The European Union is expected soon to accuse multiple banks of attempted collusion in the setting of Euribor, according to people briefed on the probe.

Euribor, cousin of Libor, may have been cooked too Read More »

Be careful how you fill out your PTIN renewal – some of the info is released to the public

Be attentive as you complete your PTIN renewal.  Your name, address and certain other info is subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act.

The AICPA has an article on the issue – Managing public PTIN information.

From the article:

Be careful how you fill out your PTIN renewal – some of the info is released to the public Read More »

Focus is again on Big 4 consulting and independence

More attention is coming to bear on the growing amount of consulting in the Big 4. The HP – Autonomy fiasco has called attention to the issue again.

The volume of consulting work is growing fast.

If you occasionally check in to see what the huge firms are doing, here are four five articles you can browse.

Focus is again on Big 4 consulting and independence Read More »

Want a quick overview of the peer review program?

Going through your first review soon and want to get an idea what’s involved?  Want to figure out how things are working since your last long-ago review?

Check out pages 4 and 5 of the Fall 2012 issue of UPDATE from the California Board of Accountancy. You can find it on this page. A direct link to the PDF is here.

I’ve been a peer reviewer for over a year now and I’m still learning the subtleties of how the program works. I know it is very complicated.  When I walk CPAs through the process, I can tell it is confusing. New forms. New terminology. New report names (pass instead of unqualified).

If you are going through your first peer review or it’s been a long time since you last did so, you’ll find that summary will give you a survey of what’s involved.

Want a quick overview of the peer review program? Read More »

HP’s fraud allegations still a bit vague

I still can’t quite figure out what is in Autonomy’s accounting that was a severe problem and why that led to an $8.8 billion write-off.  That seems to be a common thread in the discussion of HP and Autonomy that I’ve been reading lately.

I won’t go into much detail. Just want to give a few links to leave a trail of the direction things seem to be going.

HP’s fraud allegations still a bit vague Read More »

Time to let the dust settle on HP’s writeoff of Autonomy goodwill

The view of HP’s claimed fraud against its acquired sub is getting murkier.  Looks like we need to let the dust settle before we decide who gets the vigilante mob’s lynching.

News filtering out now is about a lot of revenue that can be recognized under IFRS but not under U.S. GAAP. Apparently, some things we would consider to be “channel stuffing” are allowed under IFRS.

Time to let the dust settle on HP’s writeoff of Autonomy goodwill Read More »

Umm. Looks like we need lots more info on the HP writeoff

I previously used the analogy of a train wreck in progress. Looks like the freight cars are still flying through the air.

Jonathan Weil, in his post at Bloomberg, HP’s Explanation Still Makes No Sense, says the numbers provided by HP aren’t adding up.

The allegation by HP is that

About $200 million of Autonomy’s revenue had been recorded prematurely or improperly over a two-year period beginning in 2009,

Umm. Looks like we need lots more info on the HP writeoff Read More »

This month’s accounting train wreck involves an $8 billion writeoff at HP

If you enjoy watching train wrecks while the freight cars are still airborne and the engine is still sliding down the track sideways, you really have to quickly check out HP’s investment in Autonomy.  You can watch it unfold in daily slow mo.

Fast background, amounts, Big 4 players, and some links

This month’s accounting train wreck involves an $8 billion writeoff at HP Read More »

Convergence or Co-whatever-its-called-today with IFRS is Co-drifting-away

The IASB staff have released a report responding to the very lukewarm SEC staff report on IFRS convergence.  Tom Selling at The Accounting Onion characterizes the IASB report as The IASB’s Stages of Grief.

He points out numerous places where there are massive differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. A few examples he sees are:

Convergence or Co-whatever-its-called-today with IFRS is Co-drifting-away Read More »

The so-called ‘small GAAP’ from AICPA is gonna’ be great. It’s actually called financial reporting framework for small- and medium sized entities and it’s not GAAP, but you get the point.

Just finished watching a webinar from the AICPA, Financial Reporting Framework for Small- and Medium-sized Entities FRF for SMEs

This framework, FRF-SME, will be extremely helpful for owner-managed businesses.

If you’ve been waiting for “small-GAAP” for a decade or three, it has finally arrived.  This will be one of two ways you can get to simpler, easier financial statements.

I will provide a few random thoughts on key ideas from the webinar.

Overall goal

The so-called ‘small GAAP’ from AICPA is gonna’ be great. It’s actually called financial reporting framework for small- and medium sized entities and it’s not GAAP, but you get the point. Read More »