Attestation Update – A&A for CPAs

Technical stuff for CPAs providing attestation services

To what purpose did Arthur Andersen die? Part 1

with 4 comments

In a March 14, 2012 editorial, the Chicago Tribune ponders what greater cause may have existed behind the 2002 collapse of Big 5 accounting firm Arthur Andersen.

Their conclusion? Andersen died in vain.

David Albrecht, in his post 10 Years Later – Did Andersen Die in Vain?, reaches a very different conclusion. More on that in part 3 of this series. If this post has already caught your interest, you’ll enjoy reading his post now.

The firm collapsed in the wake of a felony indictment for obstruction of justice regarding their audit of Enron.  About 85,000 people worldwide lost their job, which includes around 28,000 in the US.  The firm was convicted and surrendered its license to practice. The conviction was overturned on appeal because of faulty jury instructions from the judge.  Since the firm had already disbanded, there was no point for a retrial.

Andersen died in vain

The editorial’s conclusion is there was no point to the collapse of the firm, no greater good served by it. The conclusion of the editorial:

Did Andersen’s demise serve the public interest? No.

There were thousands of innocent victims, the out-of-work employees. The fall of Andersen could have put auditors, lawyers, regulators and other financial watchdogs on notice, but the backlash it engendered spoiled any deterrent effect.

Andersen’s actions shaped the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation that tightened rules for corporate internal controls and public disclosures, while clarifying the obligation to preserve important business documents. But SOX, as it’s called, has proven to create problems, substantially raising compliance costs for law-abiding public companies, which pay more now in audit fees to Andersen’s onetime competitors.

The greatest tragedy of Andersen’s fall? It fell for nothing. What a loss for Chicago, and what a disservice to all those like Arthur Andersen himself who never would sell their integrity, at any price.

It is as if the death of Arthur Andersen should have had some intrinsic value, perhaps on the order of the brave American soldiers storming the cliffs at Pointe du Hoc during the landing at Omaha Beach.  Only for such a noble purpose should soldiers or CPA firms die.

And yet…

Next post will look at Andersen’s pattern of behavior.

Written by Jim Ulvog

March 20, 2012, 10:56 am at 10:56 am

Posted in Audits

Tagged with ,

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I likie your final paragraph, “It is as if the death of AA should have …”

    David Albrecht

    March 20, 2012, 11:50 am at 11:50 am

  2. […] Attestation Update – A&A for CPAs HomeAbout Ulvog CPASSARS #19 documentation requirements « To what purpose did Arthur Andersen die? Part 1 […]

  3. […] First post in this series discussed an editorial in the Chicago Tribune concluding that Big 5 accounting firm Andersen died in vain. […]

  4. […] As I’ve mentioned before, the federal prosecutors came to the conclusion that the senior leadership of Arthur Andersen considered another round of sanctions as nothing more than the cost of doing business. […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: