Attestation Update – A&A for CPAs

Technical stuff for CPAs providing attestation services

Tiny step forward in identifying audit partners

leave a comment »

Audit Concept. Colored Document Folders Sorted for Catalog. Closeup View. Selective Focus.

Courtesy of

The PCAOB finally approved a proposal to require the lead engagement partner on a public company audit to be disclosed. The name of the partner will have to be listed in a separate form filed with the SEC.

Michael Rapoport gives the few more details that are available:  Regulator Approves Naming of Audit-Firm Partners in Charge of Corporate Audits.

My thinking has changed on this topic. I used to think this was irrelevant.

I now think the best approach would be to disclose most, if not all, of the partners working on an engagement. The second reviewer and tax partners are also key players. On really huge audits, it would be worth tracking who the additional partners are to see if they also have a track record of working on problem audits. That would also allow outsiders to track whether partners are just cycled in-and-out or put on a merry-go-round of taking over each others jobs. Might also allow watching to see if a partner has such a huge supporting load that doesn’t allow paying attention to the audits.

I think it is a very weak step, but a positive step. Unfortunately, I am sure that there will never be any follow up steps.

Written by Jim Ulvog

December 17, 2015, 8:44 am at 8:44 am

Posted in Audits

Tagged with

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: